<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Literature: Skill vs. Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:39:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17247</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17247</guid>
		<description>will sure do that and put in quotes with your name!
Thanks, Dawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will sure do that and put in quotes with your name!<br />
Thanks, Dawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17246</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17246</guid>
		<description>Hi Dawn, 

Thanks for your response! I&#039;m a homeschool graduate as well, so I&#039;m perhaps more accustomed to thinking about issues like this than some folks. Absolutely, feel free to use the post in your e-mail. Just please link back to my site :). Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dawn, </p>
<p>Thanks for your response! I&#8217;m a homeschool graduate as well, so I&#8217;m perhaps more accustomed to thinking about issues like this than some folks. Absolutely, feel free to use the post in your e-mail. Just please link back to my site <img src='http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17245</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17245</guid>
		<description>I stumbled across this post as I googled &quot;as Christians what makes good literature&quot;. I love this. Especially the last paragraph. I homeschool. WE uses a Classical Co-op here in Texas. With the literature curriculum there has been a selection with several instance of cursing and taking Gods name in vain. I do not consider this to be good literature. Definitely for my 5th grader. It has brought me to the question of this: By what standard do we judge literature as good. Please know that I in no way intend to sound legalistic. My faith in Christ is not about following some list of rules. I want only to honor Him in this area.
May I use your blog article in the email I am writing tot he school/co-op?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled across this post as I googled &#8220;as Christians what makes good literature&#8221;. I love this. Especially the last paragraph. I homeschool. WE uses a Classical Co-op here in Texas. With the literature curriculum there has been a selection with several instance of cursing and taking Gods name in vain. I do not consider this to be good literature. Definitely for my 5th grader. It has brought me to the question of this: By what standard do we judge literature as good. Please know that I in no way intend to sound legalistic. My faith in Christ is not about following some list of rules. I want only to honor Him in this area.<br />
May I use your blog article in the email I am writing tot he school/co-op?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17209</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17209</guid>
		<description>I think we can recognize that a piece of writing is good as literature (that is, is done well as a piece of art) but bad as truth, and vice versa. The BEST art, including literature, will bring the two together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can recognize that a piece of writing is good as literature (that is, is done well as a piece of art) but bad as truth, and vice versa. The BEST art, including literature, will bring the two together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17207</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17207</guid>
		<description>Hmm ... I just re-read your post and I&#039;m now wondering if you&#039;ve answered my questions in the second paragraph. If so, I apologise for repeating! *Smile!* Otherwise, I&#039;d still love to know what you think! *Smile!*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8230; I just re-read your post and I&#8217;m now wondering if you&#8217;ve answered my questions in the second paragraph. If so, I apologise for repeating! *Smile!* Otherwise, I&#8217;d still love to know what you think! *Smile!*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17206</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17206</guid>
		<description>I think Christian fiction IS literature if it&#039;s executed to a high standard of artistic excellence, but Christian writing that is clunky (good word - and I&#039;ve read a number of &quot;best sellers&quot; that I would describe as clunky ... due to inaccuracy and emotionless-ness if not, otherwise, weak writing) is NOT literature. But what about Christian fiction that IS excuted to a high standard of artistic excellence (the plot is credible and engaging, the characters are &quot;alive&quot; and emotionally authentic and you&#039;ve got, got, got to read more - NOW!), but is NOT the truth? What if it twists the truth? What if it exalts the opposite of the truth? Just wondering - I&#039;d love to know what you think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Christian fiction IS literature if it&#8217;s executed to a high standard of artistic excellence, but Christian writing that is clunky (good word &#8211; and I&#8217;ve read a number of &#8220;best sellers&#8221; that I would describe as clunky &#8230; due to inaccuracy and emotionless-ness if not, otherwise, weak writing) is NOT literature. But what about Christian fiction that IS excuted to a high standard of artistic excellence (the plot is credible and engaging, the characters are &#8220;alive&#8221; and emotionally authentic and you&#8217;ve got, got, got to read more &#8211; NOW!), but is NOT the truth? What if it twists the truth? What if it exalts the opposite of the truth? Just wondering &#8211; I&#8217;d love to know what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17202</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17202</guid>
		<description>Very true. In my opinion, art done excellently will always do a better and more lingering job of getting its truths across as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true. In my opinion, art done excellently will always do a better and more lingering job of getting its truths across as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17200</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17200</guid>
		<description>Good point, Rachel!  I&#039;d...hehe...forgotten about that aspect of good literature for the moment. :-)  And I agree with you again; I&#039;ve read some Christian fiction that was clunky and cardboard, which does NOT meet my criteria for good literature.  And I&#039;ve noticed that many cardboard style Christian fiction also doesn&#039;t present the Gospel accurately or completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Rachel!  I&#8217;d&#8230;hehe&#8230;forgotten about that aspect of good literature for the moment. <img src='http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   And I agree with you again; I&#8217;ve read some Christian fiction that was clunky and cardboard, which does NOT meet my criteria for good literature.  And I&#8217;ve noticed that many cardboard style Christian fiction also doesn&#8217;t present the Gospel accurately or completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Starr Thomson</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17199</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Starr Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17199</guid>
		<description>Ah, but ANY story with biblical truth? What if it was abysmally written, with cardboard characters, clunky language, and plot twists that lacked any credibility? Would it still qualify as &quot;good literature,&quot; just because it came from a biblical worldview or worked in truth? Probably not ;). Christian art, in any form, has the dual challenge of being excellent artistically AND being excellent in the area of truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but ANY story with biblical truth? What if it was abysmally written, with cardboard characters, clunky language, and plot twists that lacked any credibility? Would it still qualify as &#8220;good literature,&#8221; just because it came from a biblical worldview or worked in truth? Probably not <img src='http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Christian art, in any form, has the dual challenge of being excellent artistically AND being excellent in the area of truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/2009/11/good-literature-skill-vs-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-17198</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelstarrthomson.com/?p=796#comment-17198</guid>
		<description>I agree.  A story with Biblical truth would qualify as good literature in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  A story with Biblical truth would qualify as good literature in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
